A disturbing new development in the world of PR flaks and music hacks: more and more, it seems, I'm receiving emails from publicists that conclude, "We're looking for features and reviews on this one!" Is it just me, or are things going all topsy-turvy? I know, dear publicists, that your job is to sell me on your musician's story, so that I turn around and pitch it to one of my editors. (Or, if I'm an editor, to assign it to a hack like me.) But it's that "we're looking for" that really rubs me the wrong way; I'm hardly here just to satisfy your desires. I mean, sure, I'm looking for a lot of things -- cheap airfare to Europe, a Democratic president in 2004, an attractive woman with good shoes who doesn't think there's something wrong with me just because I listen to techno instead of indie rock. (Sorry, had to get that off my chest.) But I don't go appending that to the end of my every email; such appendage would signify, among other things, that I actually expected to attain said goals simply by specifying them.
And also (now that I'm in full rant mode), doesn't the publicist's little wish-list seem a mite redundant? Of course you're looking for coverage of various sorts for these upstanding artists of yours. That's why you sent me the CD; that's why you keep emailing me. I'm under no illusion that you're doing this for your health, and neither am I (though timesucks like this blog suggest that I do way more work for free than otherwise). And my job (or "job," if you like), ultimately, is not to accede to your desires, nor to facilitate your aims in some kind of some kind of super-lubed workflow of global information management, but rather to decide if your artist sucks or not, and if not, how much she/he does not suck, and where, if anywhere, might be an appropriate outlet for me to pitch/assign a story, much to the betterment of humankind, or at least next February's Pazz & Jop poll.
It has nothing to do with what you're looking for.
Right now, I'm looking for your artist's crap CD so I exchange it at Amoeba for, oh, I don't know some Echo and the Bunnymen cut-outs, or maybe a new spool of CD-Rs. I'd say I was looking for the delete key, but that'd be a lie -- I've got command+delete down to an automatic motor function, so come correct or be whisked away to magnetic non-existence faster than you can say "manufactured buzz." Next!
Posted by philip at March 17, 2004 07:13 PMsounds like someone's a little miffed they didn't get featured in this week's billboard magazine cover story about the supposed "importance" of daily newspaper music critics. but probably not. being a very small-fry music critic myself, i find it amusing when publicity types pester me for a review or a feature - i always feel that my opinion matters very little in the grand scheme of things, but that's just the paranoid high fidelity side of my personality creeping through. you probably don't remember this philip, but we traded tortoise live bootleg tapes way back in like 1996 or so.
Posted by: dominic devito at March 18, 2004 12:37 AMPhilip Sherburne I kiss you.
Posted by: M Matos at March 18, 2004 03:18 PMSo I'm not a sleazy publicist.
Ahh man.. I was starting to wonder.
BTW you might dig the Phon.o I'm
sending your way.
-
A
I mean, sure, I'm looking for a lot of things -- cheap airfare to Europe, a Democratic president in 2004, an attractive woman with good shoes who doesn't think there's something wrong with me just because I listen to techno instead of indie rock. (Sorry, had to get that off my chest.)
ha ha word.
Posted by: jess at March 21, 2004 06:09 AMan attractive woman with good shoes who doesn't think there's something wrong with me just because I listen to techno instead of indie rock.
It's this town, trust me. Is there no end to the indieness?
Posted by: adaml at March 22, 2004 02:38 PMdude, OTM. i fuckin hate that shit. they do the same shit for college radio. 'we're looking for adds on this one! c'mon y'all unpaid, earnest radio nerds. make THIS band the one!'
Posted by: ken t at March 23, 2004 10:35 PM